Thanks to some helpful feedback, I'm working on a small update to the "wiper module" for my  Bambu X1/P1 Spares Box .  The "wiper module" is the part shown in light blue in the image above.  It is designed to hold five of the wipers for the Bambu X1 or P1 series printers.  The changes include large holes for the small pegs on the base of the wipers, and a more aggressive clip design.  I'm gonna test the changes today, and if it works better, the update will be posted in the next couple days. 


Update 3/19/2025 - The updated wiper module was tested and holds the wipers more securely.  I've updated the 3mf profile and models over on MakerWorld, so you can find them here:

https://makerworld.com/en/models/62636-bambu-labs-x1-p1-spare-parts-case-version-3-1

While I was running a prototype print today, to test an update to my Bento Style recirculating filter, I had a jam occur inside the AMS, after some wet PLA snapped as I was unloading the spool.  When there is a broken bit of material inside the AMS, it can be a pain to remove, sometimes requiring partial disassembly of the AMS or even the AMS internal hub.  There is a "trick" that I recently found to clear AMS jams though, and if it works, it can save a good bit of time.  The method I've been able to use is described below, but this method is not the recommended way to clear filament jams in the AMS, and therefore I have to add that this information is for educational purposes only, and if you follow what I did below, you do so at your own risk.  Additionally, this only works if the jam is inside the AMS, it will not work if the jam is outside the AMS or in the hotend. Also please use eye protection when working on printers, read the manual, don't eat the silica gel packets, etc...

This is the method I've used to clear filament jams inside the AMS, and sometimes it even works:

1. I remove the spool where the break occurred, and wait for the printer to stop trying to load/unload the filament.  There may be a red light on the feeder.  There may be an error message as well. 
2. I then disconnect the Bowden tube at the back of the AMS (this may require partly removing one of the center spools).  If another spool needs to be removed to access the disconnect, I avoid pulling the filament out for that spool.
3. Next I cut off a 16" length of filament, preferably PETG, but definitely not the same wet spaghetti PLA that broke in the first place.  The filament must be good material which can flex without cracking. 
4. I then install a good spool in the slot where the break occurred (not the wet spool), and then feed the filament in as far as it will go through the feeder tube for the slot, until it stops (just until it stops).
5. I next insert the length of good filament (the 16" section) into the back of the AMS where the Bowden was removed, until it stops, keeping some light pressure on it.  It's important to keep fingers far enough away from where the filament goes into the AMS, since the filament will get pulled in on the next step.  A short length of Bowden tube could also be attached to the AMS rear filament inlet to assist with this, but I've done it without needing a tube.
6. From the printer screen, I then attempt to unload the filament on the position where the break occurred.  While the printer is unloading, I keep light pressure on the filament that is fed into the rear of the AMS.  Making sure to keep fingers well away from the rear filament inlet on the AMS, as the filament is pulled into the AMS.
7. Once the AMS starts to draw in the 16" length of filament from the rear of the AMS, I let go of the filament being fed into the AMS.  The rest of the process is hands off.  Any weird noises at this point, I'd probably power off the printer and clear the jam the "correct" way.
8. I allow the filament attached to the good spool, which was fed all the way into the AMS slot to be pushed out.  I usually will try and grab the loose end as it gets ejected from the feeder, so it does not end up tangled.  Following it, should be the broken piece, which will then be followed by the length of good filament (about 16") which was fed in from the back of the AMS.  
9. Once the 16" piece of good filament is pushed out of the AMS (through the front feeder for the slot), the clog should be cleared (if the broken piece was previously ejected from the feeder in the prior step).
10. Finally, I will dry the spool that had the break, and then it can be reloaded into the same slot. It should be possible to continue printing at that point using the dry filament.

The TL;DR of this is that I use a section of filament from both sides of the break, which are pushed against the broken section of filament inside the AMS.  The AMS can then (potentially) unload the filament, and move the broken piece out when the internal hub and the feeder drive against the good sections of filament that "sandwich" the break.  If it works, the broken part will be driven out through the feeder, along with the good sections of filament used to drive the break though the AMS.

If that does not work, then the AMS will need to be disassembled to clear the jam.  It's not a bad idea to do that anyway, since it allows the internal Bowden tubes to be inspected for wear, and if the clog is inside the hub, the hub can also be cleaned out (it collects filament dust over time).  As with any off label work on a printer, I always try and be ready to shut off the printer, if things start making weird noises.  It hasn't happened yet, but a "plan B" is always a good idea.  

My "New Years Resolution" was to get several of my older designs back on track.  Some are updates to existing designs, and some are new (though stuck on the back burner), and one has been undergoing an uh... long term test, yeah, that's the ticket lol.  That last design is what I've been working on lately, and the one I want to get released next.  It's a Bento Box style recirculation filter, which I've been running in my Bambu X1C for about a year and a half now (without issues).  I know, what the heck, right? 

I probably should have released it long ago, but in the back of my head, there's been two things which have nagged at me regarding the design, and they are the complexity, and the cost.  I've gotten feedback on other unrelated designs, where folks reject the idea that they may be required to buy more hardware than they imagine is needed, and I get that (though I don't always agree).  For this filter design however (as I currently run it), I felt that would be a valid criticism, since it is expensive as I've built it.  When I calculated the current cost for the parts needed to build the filter, it ended up between $26.90 to $46.95, and that was based on the price for the actual parts only.  If building one of the filters, the costs would go up, since many of the parts can only be purchased in packs of 5 or more, so not ideal.  The lower end of that pricing is also based on AliExpress prices (the upper end is from Amazon).  Add the tariffs, and the fact that the de minimis rule will be going away soon, and the costs are only gonna be going up.  The end of de minimis just means the days of buying $20 worth of parts from AliExpress for a project, are going away (tariffs will add some, but a bigger problem is the approximately $30 plus customs "Merchandise Processing Fee" (MPF), that'll get tacked onto each order).  Likely prices on Amazon will also go up for many small parts too, since they're often sold by 3rd parties who rely on de minimis to keep prices low.  

So due to the high cost of the components, I've been making some changes to bring down the overall cost (at least an an option).  I think I could drop the parts cost to a more reasonable $20-ish, if the PWM fan control and fuse were deleted from the design, which are pretty simple changes.  Right now, I'm planning on a regular and a low cost build option, where the regular cost version will have all the bells and whistles (like the one I've been running for over a year).  The low cost option will use simple 2 wire 5020 blowers, an illuminated rocker switch, and a DC power inlet jack.  The WAGO's could be optional as well, if the connections were soldered instead.  The lower cost version will still need to be tested though, so I will need to pick up some 2 wire fans (or find some).  

Something else that needs some work is the name.  The current working name is Koraku, which is a variation on the "Bento Box" theme.  I've also thought about calling it MMM for "Marvin the Microparticle Machine", since it looks a bit disappointed with it's purpose in life.  I'm not really happy with either of those, so I may need to solicit some better name ideas on Reddit for the design (though that'd almost guarantee it'd be named Filter McFilterFace lol).

I wanted to add some pics, but the version I'm testing right now is still in parts and not done printing, so here are some of the version that I've been testing for over a year now.  The last pic of the CAD model is closer to the release version, and will be a bit taller, with a larger 2 tier carbon compartment, and a bit more room for wiring.  There will also be some small changes on the low cost version, which will swap the knob control with an illuminated toggle switch.  

It's been a while since I posted any 3D prints, but there are a few things in progress.  The first is an update to the 1x2 Gridfinity Watch Case, which is currently designed to hold a "normal" size watch, and has a TPU liner in the top lid of the case.  I'm gonna update it to hold up to a 52mm wide watch, and the new design will also have a TPU liner in the top and base to better protect a larger watch.  I'm also considering adding a modular latch design to this case as well, though I don't know if it's really necessary.  This design has been fully test printed, but I need to get some pics and write it up before it will be posted.

Update 3/12/2025 - The Wider 1x2 Gridfinity Watch Case is now uploaded to MakerWorld, and you can find it here:

https://makerworld.com/en/models/1203806-gridfinity-1x2-wide-watch-case-version-3-0

The next update will be for the X1/P1 Spares Case, which will get a stronger door (on the version with a compartment in the base instead of the glue holders), an optional 5x full hot end holder, and modular latches.  The biggest deal for me are the modular latches, which I hope will resolve a rare (but annoying) problem some users have reported during assembly of the case.  They had cracked the base when they tried to latch the case, with latches that were too tight.  The problem was resolved by adding longer latch options, but modular latches will hopefully avoid the issue at the source, since the weakest part of the latch can now be printed in an orientation that will give it greater strength.

Update 3/12/2025 - The X1/P1 Spares Case has been update to v3.0.  You can find it over on MakerWorld:

https://makerworld.com/en/models/62636-bambu-labs-x1c-spare-parts-case-version-3-0

​There are a few more things which are being worked on, but they are not as close to being released yet.

And finally, I thought I'd just add a pic of a clog I recently had to clear in the internal AMS hub on my Bambu X1C's AMS unit (pic below).  The process is described here, and the only things I'd add are that a toothbrush is great for cleaning the filament dust out, and that I took care not to disturb the orientation of the four small magnets near the pneumatic couplers.  

Ukraine has been through 3 years of a war which it did not want, but though bloodied and bruised, it has managed to fend off a Russian bear attack which NATO had feared for decades.  They put a cork in Putin's territorial ambitions of rebuilding the former Soviet Union, and also showed the world the the strength of Ukraine's resolve not to fall behind Russia's shadow again.  That resistance has come at great cost though, and Putin's Russia seems only more emboldened by a US president willing to repeat the kremlin's own talking points. 

Today, something happened which will be seen as the breaking point of US leadership among developed nations, and it will have repercussions that will ripple through the next few decades.  There has never been such a display of the humble leadership forged in war, juxtaposed with the petty wickedness and greed of a wannabe king and his couch jester, broadcast live from the center of US power.  The message of ineptitude, perfidy and weakness that was sent, will be as clear to our allies as it is to our adversaries.


So what can anyone do about this?  First, I suggest calling your Senator or Representative in Congress, and let them know how you feel about what is going on.  Next you can look at the events over on www.fiftyfifty.one, and let your voice be heard (the next nationwide bipartisan protest is March 4th).  And finally, today (February 28th) you can send a message with your dollars, by joining a 1 day nationwide economic boycott.  That just means buying from local businesses only, and avoiding major retailers or large purchases in order to send an economic message that things are not OK.       

Update - Bambu has responded to the community, with a "developer" mode option for "LAN Only" mode users.  This is a good sign in my opinion, as there is a now a path forward (with updated fimrware) for users that require 3rd party tools, or are concerned with the privacy considerations around using Bambu Connect.  But it is not perfect, and there has been a bunch of feedback from the community on how to do it better (which I hope they will take to heart).  I'm also not sure if they still plan to remove an offline firmware update option (via the SD card), which would be a step backwards.  Below is the original post, which was uploaded prior to their announcement on this controversial issue.

Update 2 (1/22/2025) - The Verge has an article with a Q&A with Bambu's representative, which clears up some of the murkier points that people were concerned with.  It is worth a read.

As is often the case, when a product or service achieves a certain level of success, companies may let the mask slip a bit.  Some companies wear several masks, and we never really get to get a picture of what they may be capable of, while others wear their intentions on their sleeves, as boring and trustworthy as that may be.  Bambu Labs, which is widely admired for their technical innovations, was starting to earn some trust in the 3D printing community for their seemingly balanced approach to some touchy issues that have emerged, as hobby machines mature into consumer products.  Last Thursday though, they lifted their mask a bit and gave their customers and the 3D printing community a more candid look.  As is often the case, bad things can start off small, and the changes they announced seem that way to a good number of their customers, if the reaction on reddit is any signal.  On the surface, the changes are simply being done to address legitimate security concerns, and should simply be a footnote in the story of an innovative company.  And to be fair, many of their customers simply see it that way as well.  

For a bit of background, in the modern history of the 3D printing hobby, the user interaction with printers has been pretty simple, with three basic steps.  First, a user will either design or find a 3D model to print, and in the latter case there are many repositories of models to choose from (Thingiverse, Printables, Cults3d, MakerWorld, etc).  Next the model (usually a .STL, .STP or .OBJ file) needs to be prepared for the printer, and that requires the use of a "slicer".  The slicer does exactly what the name implies, it creates slices of the model, and commands which a 3D printer can use to create the model in the real world.  The slicers are generally open source, with the most popular being Cura, PrusaSlicer, OrcaSlicer or Bambu Studio.  Some of these slicers are open source forks of others on that list, and share a common heritage, but all the top slicers have their roots in open source.  The slicer generates a .3mf profile, and then a "GCODE" file, which in the final step, is sent over to the printer.  The printer parses the GCODE file, line by line, and uses it's instructions to build a print. layer by layer.  This is how Octopus_v6.stl goes from the computer screen, to collecting dust on a shelf (after several stops along the way, being passed between co-workers and friends). 

The TL;DR of it is: 
1. Design or find a 3D model to print (.stl, .stp, .obj files)
2. Prepare the file using a "slicer". (.3mf "profile is created), which then outputs "GCODE" that is sent to the printer.
3. The printer parses the GCODE line by line, and uses the instructions to print the object.

There is another, simpler workflow which removes step 2 from the user experience, and allows printing directly from an app.  Step 2 never really goes away though, and the slicing is simply performed in advance by other users of a platform like MakerWorld or Printables, and shared as a prepared .3mf profile set up for a specific model of printer.  There are several nuances to this workflow, and MakerWorld seems to be leaning into AI pretty heavily, so they will probably further refine it, but for now, this should do for a basic explanation of the process.  

Now, back to the controversy already in progress.  The change announced by Bambu, has placed an "authorization and authentication protection mechanism" between steps 2 and 3, that is, between the slicer and the printer.  Bambu's reasoning for doing this is security, and they claim that such a scheme is necessary in order to protect the printer from trojans and other threats.  They also point to DDoS attacks on their network which caused outages on MakerWorld.  Bambu claims that they are working with 3rd party software and hardware providers, whose products or software will be broken by the changes, though they make no commitments that full functionality of 3rd party tools will be restored (it sounds like that may never happen in some cases).  They offer two paths forward for users who rely on 3rd party tools, with the first being to avoid further firmware updates (bad), or install "Bambu Connect" to act as an authentication broker of sorts between their 3rd party tools and the printer (incomplete and also appears to be closed source).  It's unclear right now if they are making a long term commitment to maintaining Bambu Connect, or if it could be left to wither on the vine as they introduce new features (but I would not hold my breath).  

Adding to the mess, is a function of Bambu printers called "LAN Only" mode.  This is a mode of operation where a Bambu printer can be isolated from any Bambu cloud or network services.  "LAN Only" mode was added in response to the concerns from some users that their private data may be shared with Bambu.  "LAN Only" mode is useful for business, institutions and privacy focused users, who require their printers to be a tool, and are less concerned with the extra functionality of using Bambu's cloud services (like the Bambu Handy app).  With "LAN Only" mode, the printer could be walled off and would still function normally, with very few limitations (primarily the loss of remote monitoring and control via the Handy app).  

On the surface, the changes that Bambu announced have a reasonable explanation, and they claim they are not locking the gate for 3rd party tools, so why the kerfuffle?  To start, the changes they announced place Bambu as a gatekeeper between the slicer and the printer, which is a new (and untrusted) concept in the open world of the 3D printing hobby.  Concerningly, this also applies to "LAN Only" mode, which belies some of their rationale for the changes.  Many users are concerned that this is the first step down the "slippery slope" of possible vendor lock for consumables, or the expulsion of 3rd party tools from the Bambu ecosystem (including the popular OrcaSlicer).  This is a reasonable fear, as Bambu printers have the required sensors which could enable vendor lock for filament refills.  Others worry that giving Bambu a veto between their slicer and the printer, could allow Bambu to parse their proprietary 3D models or even restrict what they print.  An account will also be required in the new scheme, unless printing using the SD card (which would be initiated from the printer menu itself).  In fact the only true (yet partial) work around, if using the new firmware, would be direct printing from the SD card, which is largely considered to be an unacceptable workflow for a modern 3D printer.

Upsetting things further is that the change has been poorly telegraphed, since, till now, Bambu had been adding functions such as offline SD card firmware updates (which will only be possible via the cloud going forward).  They also have a reasonable policy for handling X1Plus, which is an alternate firmware available for the X1 series.  They could have shut X1Plus down in it's tracks, but instead offered a way for interested users to give up their warranty and support, but still use X1Plus if they wished.  Another example is the "LAN Mode" previously discussed, which was implemented when users expressed concern for their proprietary models or data being potentially shared with Bambu (due to the encrypted communications between the printer and Bambu's cloud, nobody really knew what was shared).  Seems likely to me that "LAN Mode" was more about convincing businesses and institutions to buy Bambu printers, as they could be made to act as a "normal" printer without the cloud based baggage, but I was happy to see it introduced regardless of why.  So, with the latest announcement, users were caught a bit off guard, and some feel betrayed after buying expensive printers with the expectation that they could continue to use them as they had before.

In my opinion, there is truth to both sides of this.  But since Bambu did not provide a carve out for "LAN Only" mode in their new "authorization and authentication protection mechanism", I'm leaning towards the more worrying reasons for the change.  A printer that is currently in "LAN Only" mode (prior to the firmware update), can work perfectly well, even if the printer and workstation running the slicer are on a boat in the middle of the ocean, or on a spaceship without any Internet connection.  The new scheme however, will require an internet connection to authorize some commands between the slicer and printer.  I feel they are effectively removing "LAN Only" mode as an option.  That may not seem like a big deal, but for many, that was a key reason for buying a Bambu printer, or even a requirement if they need to work on sensitive or proprietary designs.         
  
If Bambu does not back track a bit, at least on "LAN Only" mode, there is little reason for me to think that the change does not represent the first step to closing the gate of their garden.  They will have effectively placed their veto between users and their printers, which opens up a number of user unfriendly possibilities.  The idea of not being able to update firmware going forward is not a serious work around.  And rolling back to a firmware that does not require their authorization scheme will not be possible on any future models (which is clearly stated in their announcement).  I've  been looking forward to their next flagship printer (due sometime early this year), but the new direction Bambu is signaling is not a good one in my opinion.  It seems to me that they've altered the terms of deal for the part of their customer base who rely on a true (isolated from the Internet) "LAN Only" mode.  The hope for existing owners of Bambu printers, who disagree with the new direction, lies in either a partial reversal of changes (at least for "LAN Only" users), or with the community, and projects like X1Plus, or other work-arounds that may allow people to take back their printers.

(See the update from Bambu at the top of this post).

Apologies for anyone who used the contact form and did not get a response, but it has been 99% SPAM which I just skim every now and then.  In the past several months it's really gotten out of hand though.  If you would like to get in touch with me, the best way is to PM me over on Printables or MakerWorld, since I regularly check messages at both sites.  If you want to discuss a model that is uploaded, you can also just post a comment on it.

I went a bit overboard with my Christmas shopping this year, but it's OK since I spent the most on myself :D  There were some really great combo deals on Kobalt 24V cordless tools this season, and one was particularly good (which is over), but seemed to fly under the radar.  Needless to say, my old cordless tools (Black and Decker 18V), which have served me pretty well (aside from a sawzall that burned up recently), are gonna have to step aside to make room for a new starting lineup.  The Kobalt tools themselves seem pretty well regarded, and they check off quite a few boxes, being brushless, 24v, and having a good batter warranty (on paper at least), and most of all, the price's were great.  In addition to the sawzall, I picked up several 2.0 and 4.0A battery kits, which included a "free" tool.  I ended up with a oscillating multi-tool, jigsaw, trim router and a couple drills.  Now however, I need a place to put them all.  I really like this set of wall mounts for the Kobalt tools, however I need to mount them to a pegboard.  I started working on a pegboard adapter for that set, and then decided to see if I could mount the battery holder on top of the toolholder, so I just ran a test print of that (which will need some work).  If it all works out I will post some pics and a link to the models here.  I may also post the pegboard adapter separately, since it should be compatible with the remix source design too.  I didn't want to start a new project this year, but it is what it is, and really, it will be a remix so it's not really a "new" project lol.  

Update 1/2/2025:  I printed a few of the remixed designs, but found that I wanted to make changes to the parts of the design which interface with the battery and tools, so I am abandoning the remix and starting over from scratch.  A couple things I want to focus on with the design are a snug fitting tool holder, a latching battery holder, and vents for the battery (I don't want to block them).  Printability is also something I'm working on, which will be a bit tricky, since the holders will need to be printed in two orientations depending on the tool it's designed for. 

So far, I've printed a few iterations of the parts of the holders which connect to the tool and battery to test them with my Kobalt stuff, and they are getting close.  There may also be a spring detent version of the holder for tools, however that is just an option I'm considering.  

Since I decided to work on this from scratch, the tool+battery holders will be my own design (fully), but I already made a pegboard adapter for CarbonForged's Kobalt 24v tool holders, and that model will get posted as a remix, however right now there is only one size (and 3 sizes of adapters is required).

Update 1/3/2025:  After a couple test prints and iterations to the design, the prototype holders are fitting nicely.  I used the stock 2.0Ah battery as a basis to design both the battery holder and the tool holders, and added some extra clearance (but not too much), since I don't want them being loose.  There is an angled section near the front of the battery, which took a few tries to get right, but I made some simple printed template pieces to check that angle, which turns out to be 9°.  It's a small detail, but it was buggin' me when I looked at the prototype holders and saw that the angle (5°) was not correct, but it is now.

It felt like the tool holder needed some form of lightly engaged mechanical hold on the tools, but I did not want to have a release button for the tool, so I thought a simple spring loaded detent would work OK.  That element is now fully designed out, and should work, though I need to find my Harbor Freight tool collection to verify that (it will use a 7/32" x 1.5" compression spring from the Harbor Freight Spring Assortment Kit).  Some additions to the now (should be) final design are a pair of battery vent holes in the sides of the mount, a 2 color label insert (so I know what tool goes where), and a cover for the sprint detent stuff.  The base of the tool mount is an even 60x100mm, however I may need at least one larger size (maybe 60x120+mm) for some of the tools. 

The designs for the pegboard adapters for CarbonForged's Kobalt 24v tool holders are done (in a small. medium and large size to match the bases of the CarbonForged's holders).  However I'm having second thoughts on them, since I'm not sure how robust they will be due to the weight of the tools.  I'm gonna wait till I can test similar pegboard adapters for my Kobalt Tool mounts, and see how I feel about them before I post those.    

Update 1/6/2025:  I think I have the peg mount design completed for my new Kobalt tool and battery mounts (which were inspired by but not a remix of CarbonForged's design), so now I just need to test them.  If the peg mounts work well, then I will apply the same changes to complete the peg board adapters for CarbonForged's Kobalt 24v tool holders as well.  The new design will utilize some steel peg board mounting clips, which should resolve any of my worries about the peg mounts being too weak.

Something else I noticed is that Lowes has the deal of the day today for a 2.0Ah and 4.0Ah battery, charger, case and a free tool for $80.  This is the best deal on that combo yet (lowest I saw it for was $90 during the holidays).  These kits are a great way to get started with the Kobalt lineup, since they have a good selection of free tools to pick from with that combo.  If you get the deal, and cannot seem to be able to pick a tool for the free gift (other than the jigsaw), click on the "Choose your gifts" (on the right side under the price) and then click the minus sign "-" next to the jigsaw (to zero that choice out).  Then you should be able to pick a tool from any of the dozen or so tool choices they have with the combo.

Update 1/9/2025:  I've been going through my tools and designing holders for them (untested currently), but when I got to the sawzall I hit a problem.  The best way to mount the sawzall would be to have it hang from the holder, but the current design is set up to only have a spring detent, and not a latching mechanism similar to the way the batteries mount to the tool.  I could mount the sawzall upside down, so the sawzall "drops" into the holder, but that would put a lot of torque on the holder and the pegboard mounts.  I decided to back up a bit, and redesigned part of the mounts to allow for a button release mechanism, which I'd use for some of the tools that require a latching holder.  Some tools will need a latch due to their mounting orientation, or just to have a bit more security with a heavy tool.  I like the spring detent for most other tools though, since they can just be popped in or out of the holders, without trying to manipulate buttons to release the tool.  

This design is not yet fully tested however.  The peg mount works pretty much as well as I could hope for, and are very solid, but I'm waiting on some 6x40mm springs from AliExpress to test the holders. I may just break down and buy another assortment from Harbor Freight, just to test it, since I seem to have lost the springs from the assortment I thought I had around here.

So far this design has been fun, but I have many hours of work into it already, so I'm hopeful when I get the parts, everything will work (or can be made to work).  "Works in CAD" has burned me before lol, but the proof will always be in the prints.

I'm still planning to make a peg adapter for for CarbonForged's Kobalt 24v tool holders, which inspired this whole project (my original plan was just to make the peg adapters, but as you can read above, it didn't quite work out that way :-)  Those however will be done after I can test my designs, which will use a similar peg board adapter, using the full weight of the tools on them.  I have little doubt though, that the new design with the steel clips will be up to the task.   

Edit- I just noticed the peg clips in the third pic below are upside down.  It's just a matter of rotating the base 180° though, so not a bit deal, but I thought I'd mention it.  

Update 1/10/2025:  Not much to add about the mounts, I'm still working through them for my collection of tools, but I did see a smoking deal today on a kit with a hammer drill, 1/4" impact, LED light, a 2.0 and 4.0Ah battery, charger, case and 2 free tools for $150.  The 4.0Ah battery in the kit is the upgraded "Ultimate Output" battery as well. This is a great kit for the money, but they seem to be selling out of them (I had to go 10 miles away to find one in stock).  The deal (which is half off), ends at midnight I believe.  

https://www.lowes.com/pd/Kobalt-XTR-3-Tool-24-Volt-Max-Brushless-Power-Tool-Combo-Kit-with-Hard-Case-Charger-Included-and-2-Batteries-Included/1002274128

Christmas and the holidays are like the capstone for the year that is now mostly behind us.  Whether it's the religious significance, or just having a reason to see or talk with old friends and family and catch up, it's cool to know that our ancestors had the wisdom to set aside part of the year for a small break, and as a time to reflect.  I hope that you will have a warm place, and a welcoming friend or family member (furry family members included), to enjoy the holidays with.  I hope you have a Merry Christmas and Very Happy Holiday!

I'm not much for managing social media, due to the hype, hate and just plain old bad info that it seems to be a conduit for, but I decided to give BlueSky a chance.  It will hopefully not end up as a billionaire's plaything, but if it does, it cost me nothing to join, and it will cost me nothing to quit.  I just made my first post there, and plan to post updates on some things I'm working on or upload to 3D printing repositories.  But due to the character limits, I will be keeping the interesting details of my projects over here.  My "handle" is @mystoopidstuff.bsky.social 

I probably will not be able to devote a lot of time to using Bluesky, so please don't be offended if it takes a while for me to reply or like a post, but I will check it occasionally.  I tend to monitor comments more frequently on MakerWorld and Printables, since that is where I go to check for feedback on the designs and projects I've posted on those platforms.